Evaporated of the ballast filament in My ML 160W « on: February 28, 2009, 10:01:25 AM » Author: dor123
In JAMES website Lamptech.co.uk it was written that the tungsten that evaporated from the filament carrying upward to the top side of the bulb by convection currents, but in my PHILIPS ML 160W from China the evaporated tungsten from the ballast filament fall DOWNWARD to the bottom side of the bulb. why?
		Logged

I"m don't speak English well, and rely on online translating to write in this site.
Please forgive me if my choice of my words looks like offensive, while that isn't my intention.

I only working with the international date format (dd.mm.yyyy).

I lives in Israel, which is a 220-240V, 50hz country.

	Re: Evaporated of the ballast filament in My ML 160W « Reply #1 on: March 12, 2009, 11:41:27 AM » Author: dor123
Why anyone didn't answer to me?
		Logged

I"m don't speak English well, and rely on online translating to write in this site.
Please forgive me if my choice of my words looks like offensive, while that isn't my intention.

I only working with the international date format (dd.mm.yyyy).

I lives in Israel, which is a 220-240V, 50hz country.

	Re: Evaporated of the ballast filament in My ML 160W « Reply #3 on: March 12, 2009, 02:34:18 PM » Author: dor123
Why in my Philips ML 160W the evaporated tungsten be accumulated at the downside of the bulb?
		Logged

I"m don't speak English well, and rely on online translating to write in this site.
Please forgive me if my choice of my words looks like offensive, while that isn't my intention.

I only working with the international date format (dd.mm.yyyy).

I lives in Israel, which is a 220-240V, 50hz country.

	Re: Evaporated of the ballast filament in My ML 160W « Reply #4 on: March 12, 2009, 02:59:09 PM » Author: Medved
Quote from: form109 on March 12, 2009, 01:54:36 PM i guess no one saw your post. Some saw, but have no idea...
		Logged

No more selfballasted c***