Ok interesting.
Generally, are the N.American HPS lamp systems lower than quoted in your tables? By say what percentage?
The ballast losses of the autotransformer ballasts use to be about double (with isolated output types triple), so whhen European 250W HPS system consumes about 270W, the US is around 290W. But that all is matter of design optimization of cost vs weight vs losses.
On the other hand the fact the lamps have to be operated on some transformer ballast anyway, so it does not matter that much what is the secondary voltage, allows to optimize the lamps for higher efficacy, as there is no limitation on the arc voltage as it is the case for European lamp types intended for just a series reactor ballast. That may gain about 5..10% (depends on the actual power rating, more significant with higher power lamps) back...
Also, if an LED maker claims a certain efficacy for their head, is that accurate? Is it "always", "often" or "sometimes" over stated from actual efficacy?
The standard is clear, 1000lm means 1000lm average across a large population, same as with HID, period.
Other question is, if the published figures are real and really correspond to the given design, or are not based on some "maximize lumen figure" "tuning". But that is the same with all makers, HID's being not different in this matter.
But one difference is there: The rated LED lantern lumen output contains all the losses in the optics, while try to find anything about the optical efficiency with any other lantern - you will find none. So what the 140lm/W means, if you do not know, whether the lantern will eat up 10/10'th or half od the light...
For road light it is common with reputable makers to publish the light distribution charts, but you won't find any information like that for home fixtures.