Author Topic: ge to close canadian lamp plant  (Read 2619 times)
Silverliner
Administrator
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

Rare white reflector


GoL
ge to close canadian lamp plant « on: August 07, 2009, 03:42:33 AM » Author: Silverliner
click here. pretty sad. ge also plans to close the last us household bulb plant in winchester, va.
Logged

Administrator of Lighting-Gallery.net. Need help? PM me.

Member of L-G since 2005.

Collector of vintage bulbs, street lights and fluorescent fixtures.

Electrician.

Also a fan of cars, travelling, working out, food, hanging out.

Power company: Southern California Edison.

Foxtronix
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

Formerly "TiCoune66". Also known here as Vince.


GoL UCs4tSgJSCoCIMGThBuaePhA
WWW
Re: ge to close canadian lamp plant « Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 05:04:20 PM » Author: Foxtronix
Really sad indeed. I already miss the canadian Soft White etch. It's past now  :'(
Logged

KEDER
Member
***
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


Re: ge to close canadian lamp plant « Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 09:26:20 PM » Author: KEDER
Hmm, they wil just go tomore efficent incandescents. but i will miss the old lamp.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2009, 05:01:28 PM by !KEDER » Logged
Mr. Big
Guest
Re: ge to close canadian lamp plant « Reply #3 on: August 13, 2009, 10:57:37 PM » Author: Mr. Big
I prefer an incandescent over a CFL, but if it's not a China CFL, and is not a spiral, I'll use it! The Hungary CFL I got the other day has a real simple ballast! a spiral which is essentially the same, has a complicated ballast! when it could be simple!
Logged
Medved
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

Re: ge to close canadian lamp plant « Reply #4 on: August 17, 2009, 05:00:25 PM » Author: Medved
I prefer an incandescent over a CFL, but if it's not a China CFL, and is not a spiral, I'll use it! The Hungary CFL I got the other day has a real simple ballast! a spiral which is essentially the same, has a complicated ballast! when it could be simple!
Ballast might be or simple topology, but very sensitive to component parameters, or more complex and much less sensitive and with decent protection. The consequence is, the first one likely over- or under-power the lamp (with consequence on it's life and/or performance) and fail catastrophically (components burn out at lamp EOL), so the fuse is the only component avoiding smoke and/or fire issues.
If there are EOL protection features (so the fuse is only the second-level protection), it always yield to more complex ballast.
But not valid for "more complex" => "better quality" reasonning...
Logged

No more selfballasted c***

Print 
© 2005-2025 Lighting-Gallery.net | SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies