2. Yes, it (along with the bleeder across one lamp) reduces the need for OCV per lamp, so reduces the OCV*Ilamp product, which is a figure dictating how big and expensive the ballast will be. But it to some extend complicates the safety - it becomes more difficult to prevent the ballast from generating high voltage when the lamps are not fully inserted (need for interlock switches in the sockets insulated from the lamp contact,...), so when the worker is manipulating with the lamps when the power is ON (if the "hot" side is inserted into the socket and the worker touches the other lamp terminal, the lamp may ignite and the worker may get shocked)...
3. Fluorescent (and also LPS) electronic ballasts use to use high frequency drive and use resonance boost to generate the high voltage for ignition, so the main circuit can work way more efficiently (even for its frequency) when the lamp is completely started (ignited and electrodes warmed up). Magnetic ballasts need to be wound for sufficient OCV, or need some OCV booster capable to deliver sufficient power (like electronic SOX ignitors). The thing is, with low pressure lamps is not enough just to ionize the gas, you also need to drive the lamps at sufficient power when the electrodes are still cold (so have high cathode drop, 100's V per lamp), so the cathode losses warm them as quickly as possible, in order to limit their sputtering damage.
High pressure lamps usually need the high voltage only for an initial ignition, as the anode column drop (the part of the discharge voltage drop dictated by the gas fill properties like pressure or so) on cold lamps is low enough so there is sufficient room for the extra cathode drop of cold electrodes.
|
|
|
Logged
|