This is what can happen at anytime with any centralised platform. A platform that provides its own protocol and closed list of servers which provide the service
This includes Signal too, which has a closed list of servers and they are hosted in AWS (Amazon) and Azure (Microsoft), two companies who do a whole lot to reduce everyone's information security and freedom. (Amazon always, Microsoft sometimes)
Have a look at how plain old email works
There are multiple independent servers providing the same standard service. For you to communicate with me, you don't require me to register to the same server you are in
Each of us is on a serve we chose which meets our personal terms. The servers as standard can find and communicate with each other - The email address itself contains all the needed information
Your email service provider started bothering you with age verification or you are dissatisfied in general ?
Open a new email account somewhere else, drop a message to your whole contact list to update them of the change, and go on with life
You are not asking anyone to change their service providers to suit your change, which is one of the main mechanisms of lock in in any "closed" communication service
Can't find what you want ?
Set up your own server, with as little as hosting and a domain name
Virtual hosting "in the cloud" is subject to dependence on somebody else's servers, but as long as you control the system running inside your virtual space, you set the rules in the service you host, and can implement encryption to your liking. Security may not be perfect on the remote machine, but nobody will openly mess with your encryption to implement age verification
Physical hosting can be done with as little as any old PC or Raspberry Pi at home (for the volume of email you are expected to send and receive personally). Secure it to your liking
Domain you'll have to register and upkeep, nad for anything relible it'll cost (not that much), but there again you get to choose one of thousands of domain name registrars which all provide the same service
XMPP (Jabber) implements the same concept for classic instant messaging
Choose your server, choose your software to connect to it, and keep it open in the background to receive incoming chats
What makes this difference is that this entire infrastructure was designed and set by wide consortium of people aiming to make the internet free and open for all
Vs. whoever owns Discord applying their private rules to a service they privately own, and have all rights to do so, and you have a right to not use it
What bothers me is the ever growing expectation that you do "have" a specific service. Whatsapp and the covid-era video chat apps are by far the biggest offenders here
I see a growing amount of times people who send things to me needing a confirmation that i indeed dont have Whatsapp or asking me to join into it, businesses who decline customer service because it is only available through Whatsapp (or is stated to be available also by phone, but nobody answers it), etc
I'm not a lawyer, but i do think this might possibly be illegal if it can be proven that you cannot get service A (education, customer service, ....) without agreeing to unrelated, unexpected and unreasonable terms of service B (Software EULA). However, i repetedly see it thrown out of the window
|